Triumph Tiger 955i

The throttle goes both ways - but only one of them is fun!
Back Home Up Next

 

A brief hoon on the new 2001 Tiger...

You may have read the write-up I put together last year on the T5 Tiger that I had an extended loan of from Lagunas in Maidstone, after they cattled my ST so comprehensively. For the rest of you, those who care, I concluded that it was let down by excessively twangy suspension, a comparatively gutless motor, a gearbox that was "like a spanner in a bucket of ball-bearings", excessive wind noise at high speed and crap weather protection, with a side order of looking a bit cheap and nasty in places, and with the odd ergonomic niggle (accessory socket exactly inside left knee? Dials you can't read properly at twilight or at night? Silly Triumph!)

The 2001 spec Tiger, after a most entertaining half an hour on the the Hughenden M40 demonstrator anyway, addresses the first three of those issues very successfully, whilst the aftermarket appears to have fixed the fourth nicely (see below). As to the rest, well, not a lot has changed. I'll need to compare the bike back-to-back with the R1150GS to get a good feel, but I already strongly suspect that the GS is going to win comprehensively in the 'looking solid and well put together' department, and insane BMW indicators apart, in the ergonomic/instrumentation category as well. Oh, and I think it wins 'offroad competence' by a walkover as well, but I wasn't planning on taking either bike green-laning...

I was hoping that Hughendon M40 would have had an R1150GS for me to take out for a play, but as befits a motorcycle which has effectively all but sold out for this year, they simply didn't have one. What they did have were 2001 Tiger, and 2001 TT600 demonstrators (I'll scribble something about the TT on a later occasion).

Apart from the 2001 colour schemes (a vile radioactive green colour and a more pleasant black and metallic grey), to look at the Tiger is all but identical to the 2000 bike. Close comparison of the motors might show some differences up, and this year the stock tyres have changed to be Metzler Tourances, but otherwise you'd never know from looking at it that this bike is any different to the 2000 model. However, swing a leg over it and it's immediately clear that the suspension is a lot less twangy. Last years bike would squat like a Sumo wrestler when I sat on it, and that carried through into huge fork-dive on the brakes, big fork extension and rear shock compression on acceleration, and thus evil cornering characteristics when pressing on. On the move, this years boingy bits work in ways that last years couldn't even aspire to. It's a trailie with telescopic forks, so of course there is a bit of fork dive and squat, but it's well controlled, and entirely not an issue in the way that last years forks and shock made sure it most certainly was. This is all to the good, because this years motor - lifted almost unaltered out of the Sprint ST, and delivering an extra 20+bhp (or near enough 103bhp, down from 108 in the ST but with an even fatter midrange) - would have been positively dangerous on last years suspension. As it is, the extra grunt is extremely welcome, and gives the bike the same urge that make the ST such a quick road-bike in the real world. Coupled with a 'not for road use' can on the M40 demonstrator that has presumably been carefully designed to make a sound very reminiscent of a Spitfire when you hold it nailed (The R1150GS sadly sounds like a fart in a bean can - points to the Triumph), and a silky smooth gearbox that allows you to upshift without the clutch, and downshift quickly with a little blip of the throttle, the entire package is extremely quick and entertaining to ride. Whether I could ride it sensibly... well, I don't know. Wind noise? Well, the bike I rode had the stock screen replaced by an aftermarket micro-fly-screen thing, which meant that I got clean and buffet free air at speed - fine for the summer. For winter use, Givi now do a taller screen for the Tiger - I've seen it on a bike and it is a good couple of inches taller than stock. Which leaves build/finish quality and, of course, the weather-related crotch rot problem. Hmm...

 

Copyright © 2003 Ken Haylock. All rights reserved.
Last Revised: June 12, 2003 .