|
PPC >
Reviews>
Utilities

Memory Testing, Pt 2, DocMem
Don Bradbury looks at another free RAM testing
program
|
Info |
|
Product |
DocMemory v2.0 |
|
Manufacturer |
Computer Services Technology Inc |
|
Web site |
www.simmtester.com
|
|
Price |
Free
download |
|
Rating |
9 |
If you want a quick tester for the physical memory in your computer
you could do much worse than try DocMem. Like MemTest which we
looked at recently, the program is a free download. It installs to a
bootable floppy, and it runs under its own disk operating system (FreeDOS).
The 300K DocMem20.exe self-extracting executable downloads quickly
to your Windows Desktop (or wherever you choose). Double clicking on
it extracts a series of files. You’ll probably want to copy the
archive file to its own dedicated folder on your hard disk for safe
keeping before you do this, but all of the extracted files are
automatically put on the boot floppy you supply, and from which the
tests are run. A menu then lets you choose to create the bootable
floppy disk.
Restart
the computer with the floppy in the drive, and then select whether
you want to do a full burn-in test of your memory or carry out a
quick check. The latter, on a 1GHz Pentium III with 256MB of memory,
took 10 minutes to complete, so that would detect a major memory
failure within a reasonably short time.
If,
on the other hand, you have a suspected intermittent fault (not so
uncommon), or if you want to soak test a new PC, say overnight, you
would opt for the burn-in tests where repeat test cycles are far
more likely to detect any problem – which might only show when the
chips are hot.
All of the configuration that most users would require are offered,
the tests run without user intervention, and at the end you can
choose to print the results or save them to disk for future
reference.
Conclusion
DocMem worked admirably for me, and for a free utility you wouldn’t
complain over any aspect of it. The tests are simple to carry out,
they run without assistance from the operator, and options to save
the results are adequate. What more could you ask?
Don Bradbury
^top
|