|
Browser Hijacking
When is your browser hijacked, and when is the
webmaster being helpful?
Over this last week or so I’ve been involved in
quite an argument – and it all revolves around what some people
refer to as “Browser Hijacking” – the technique of automatically
re-sizing a visitor’s browser window to dimensions the Web designer
has chosen.
I can see both sides of the story, to be truthful.
I’m unhappy about these Web sites that size your browser window to
within a pixel or so of the maximum without maximising the window
itself, although given that my own browser window is often re-sized
to suit the Web site I’m on at the time, it’s not all that onerous.
By the same token, if there’s a “fit your window to
this site” button, I’m as likely as not to click on it – that way,
I’m seeing the site the way its designer intended it to be. At the
end of the day, I suppose I’m not that precious about it. Perhaps
that comes from having a desktop resolution of 1600x1200 pixels, and
being used to constantly re-sizing windows in all sorts of
applications.
I’m not so sure about how I’d feel if I was running
at 800x600 all the time – I rather expect that I’d have every window
maximised anyway, so an awful lot of this just wouldn’t affect me.
Anyway, what really got to me was the attitude of
the people that disagreed with “browser hijacking”. They were, in
truth, extremely vehement and some were gratuitously rude, and
decided to take out their frustrations on me. They opined that
they’d never, ever go back to a site that re-sized their browser,
or, indeed, did anything else they didn’t agree with.
That list seemed endless, and included any site with
Flash on it or Shockwave, sites on which the text wasn’t re-sizable
to suit them, sites which spawned exit consoles (not my favourite,
I’ll admit), sites with fixed-width tables - indeed, it seems any
site with any design features at all.
Confused
Now, this confuses me. I surf for two main reasons –
one is for enjoyment, and the other is for research. I like things
that look nice – and if someone has gone to some lengths to make
their site look attractive, applied some thought to colours, fonts
etc, I tend to appreciate that.
What I’m not sure I’m all that keen on reading a
site that’s all courier, no pictures and has no design to it at all
– it’s boring, basically.
Yet, from what these people were saying, that’s
exactly what they’re after! Plain text Web-sites? Ooer!
I’d be interested to know how you feel – I’d love to
get a feel for how real people feel about this.
Does an automatic re-size of your browser window
annoy you?
Do pop-ups annoy you?
Do you run permanently maximised anyway?
Do you prefer attractive design or text-only sites?
Click on
this link to have your say in our message boards
^top
Have your say - click here
David Dorn
|